Privilege and Confidentiality in the Attorney Client Relationship
Regarding In-House Counsel and Their Employer
Fischman v. Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings America, Inc.(18-cv-08188)
{3 minutes to read} Attorney client privilege is an integral part of our legal system. As most situations that require legal intervention are emotional and stressful, reliance on an experienced professional who will commit to your needs while keeping your information confidential has allowed millions of people to have a voice and retain their rights.
But what happens if you are an attorney, your client is your employer and they violate labor laws? In September 2018, our client, Jennifer Fischman, General Counsel for Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings America (MCHA), filed a complaint against the company alleging violations of Title VII, the Equal Pay Act, NYS Human Rights Law and the NYC Administrative Code. She alleges that MCHA discriminated against her on the basis of sex by failing to promote her and paying her less than her male counterparts (unequal pay). She also alleges MCHA retaliated against her after she engaged in protected activity.
The Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that many of her allegations in the complaint are based on confidential information she obtained as an attorney for Defendants and was therefore protected by the attorney-client privilege. This highlights a key and somewhat unusual question: How can we protect in-house counsel from illegal employment practices?
This summer, a Southern District of New York judge denied the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss allowing the case to move forward. MCHA argued that the complaint must be dismissed because (1) the information pled is subject to the attorney-client privilege and (2) without it, Plaintiff does not adequately state a claim. They also argued the pleadings themselves should be confidential in that they contained attorney-client privileged information.
Judge Furman held that Defendants’ argument failed for three reasons and with respect to confidentiality of the pleadings, held that “narratives of events, rather than communications,” does not fall under the privilege. The Judge pointed out that pursuant to NYS Professional Rules, the attorney-client communications protected relate to the obtaining and providing of legal advice. In addition, “disclosures of events do not necessarily reveal confidential communications.” For example, he holds that communications with co-workers about sexism in the company does not constitute confidential client information subject to the attorney-client privilege. By that notion, all communications held by an in-house attorney with any employee would be privileged.
Thus, while the case is still in its litigation infancy, Plaintiff has already overcome a substantial legal obstacle and confirmed that the employment laws also do indeed protect attorneys.
James A. Vagnini
Partner
email: jvagnini@vkvlawyers.com
vcard
Fischman v. MCHA: Privilege and Confidentiality Regarding In-House Counsel
Your Rights. Our Fight.
Contact Us Today To Schedule A Free Consultation
Valli Kane & Vagnini LLP - Press & News
Full 5th Circ. To Examine Employer-Friendly Title VII Rule
The family behind a massive Brooklyn Navy Yards film studio complex stands accused of stiffing local partners out of $50 million in profits, a new lawsuit contends.
Steiner Studios — where films such as Steven Spielberg's"West Side Story" and Lin-Manuel Miranda's "Tick Tick Boom!" were filmed — has been named in a civil suit filed by a group of local entrepreneurs who says they developed the complex then were cut out of profits, court records show.
Brooklyn Movie Studio Shut Out $50M Profits From Partners
The family behind a massive Brooklyn Navy Yards film studio complex stands accused of stiffing local partners out of $50 million in profits, a new lawsuit contends.
Steiner Studios — where films such as Steven Spielberg's"West Side Story" and Lin-Manuel Miranda's "Tick Tick Boom!" were filmed — has been named in a civil suit filed by a group of local entrepreneurs who says they developed the complex then were cut out of profits, court records show.
Black New Yorkers Strike Back
Black New Yorkers strike back at city program that seized their properties for developers The plaintiffs say the program unfairly
The Restrictions on Attorney Fees and Settlements in FLSA Deals
{6 minutes to read} Earlier this year, the United States Court of Appeals in the Second Circuit made a decision
Criminalizing Wage Theft, New Jersey, New York, and California
Janitors, servers, and construction workers have something in common. They are likely to face wage theft in industries that underpay
SB7848A Increases Worker’s Ability to Bring Claims of Sexual Harassment to Court
By Shaloni Pinto and Aimee Christianson {Read in 4 minutes} With the passage of New York Senate Bill 7848A, the
Valli Kane & Vagnini Attorneys Named to 2018 New York Super Lawyers List
We are pleased to announce that Sara Wyn Kane, a partner at Valli Kane & Vagnini LLP has been selected
Ex-Mitsubishi Atty Claims Sex Bias Led To Her Ouster
Law360 (September 19, 2018, 8:30 PM EDT) — A Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. unit illegally refused to promote one of its
CBS Agrees To Settle Parking-Spot Guards’ OT Suit For $10M
Law360 (August 22, 2018, 10:21 PM EDT) — In the latest settlement between a major studio and production assistants hired
Supervisor sues Omni hotels, alleging sexual harassment and retaliation when she reported it
A former supervisor with Omni Hotels & Resorts has filed suit against the Dallas-based company, alleging sexual harassment and saying