ABC Studios and Marvel Television Inc. will pay $1.75 million to settle claims it didn’t pay overtime to set workers, according to an agreement that received final court approval.
Law360, Los Angeles (July 12, 2016, 4:56 PM EDT) — Valeant-owned Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. will pay $7.2 million to settle a class action alleging gender discrimination and other claims brought by female sales representatives of the medical cosmetics company, according to a final settlement order signed by a D.C. federal judge Monday. Continue reading
From the average American’s point of view, workplace harassment suits may be relegated to office environments–cubicle mazes filled with discrimination by cold-blooded corporate predators. However, harassment runs across all dimensions of American employment, from corporate settings, to manufacturing, to construction, and so on. Lately, a hurricane of highly publicized lawsuits serve to expose an often ignored segment of American employment: television. At the center of it all you will find the often regarded “nicest man on television.”
Paul Tarascio is a New York-based stage manager for live television. In January, the television professional filed a lawsuit against Jimmy Fallon, as well as many employees that work on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon and NBC, claiming gender discrimination. Tarascio claims that he was replaced because Fallon prefers female stage managers. When he went to his superiors–and then to union officials–he said he was fired.
Because of the notoriety of the celebrities at the center of these types of shows, this area of law has garnered national attention. The union-driven industry is high-powered, often ego and market driven, and moves at the speed of light. Hirings and firings are as routine on television as they are among NFL coaches. Because television is a gigantic—and extremely rich—industry, many employees may refrain from bringing an action against these networks and public figures because they fear the loss of opportunities in the industry and question whether they have the wherewithal to take on these financial giants.
A similar case involving a joke made by Jay Leno on his late night show has resulted in a lawsuit. While many of the specifics of both Leno’s and Fallon’s lawsuits are not known, the lawsuits brings to light the common misconception that celebrities are somehow exempt from State and Federal discrimination laws. Discrimination on the basis of gender is just as illegal on a multi-million dollar television set as it is at your local Pizza Hut or any other employer in the country. The law makes no exception for the elite, nor should it. Discrimination in any form is wrong and it is punishable by law.
If you feel you have been victimized at your place of work due to your gender or any other protected basis, then you have the right to seek counsel and assert your legal rights. An experienced discrimination attorney can help you understand the complexities of Federal and New York workplace law as it relates to you. Call the law offices of Valli Kane & Vagnini, LLP now at (866) 441-2873 and get one of NY’s finest employment attorneys on your side.
As most lawyers know, civil rights cases are not where the real money is in the legal profession. But one Long Island law firm has barreled into discrimination cases in the South in the past few years, citing a passion for such work.
“We do the old-fashioned civil rights work,” saidJames Vagnini, one of the three partners at Garden City-based Valli Kane & Vagnini. “If I didn’t make a nickel, I’d be just as happy. I’ve learned a lot. I wanted to do law in a way that I could sleep at night.”
The firm is making money, the partners say. But the cases have taken them into some parts of the Lone Star State where media reports indicate race relations have reached a low point in recent years.
The firm was recently in Paris, Texas, where the town’s largest employer is pipe-manufacturer Turner Industries. Black employees have said that hangman’s nooses, Confederate flags and racist graffiti have appeared at the workplace.
Last week, Valli Kane obtained from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission a “reasonable cause” letter, saying the federal agency believes discrimination has occurred at Turner and asking the company and its black employees to sit down and discuss the matter.
In response, Turner said it has formed an employee task force “to assist in promoting and maintaining a workplace that is free of harassment or discrimination.” Turner said it has “zero tolerance” for any discrimination in the workplace.
In 2008, Valli Kane took another case to the EEOC, this one in Dallas involving Allied Aviation Services Inc., which agreed to pay $1.9 million to settle a harassment lawsuit filed on behalf of black and Hispanic workers.
The law firm was formed about two years ago. The three met when they worked together at Leeds, Morelli & Brown, a law firm in Carle Place.
Previously, Vagnini had worked for the New York City Human Rights Commission while a law student at Hofstra University in Hempstead. Robert Valli Jr. had been a Queens assistant district attorney, and Sara Kane was an assistant attorney at the New York City Corporation Counsel.
The firm also handles criminal and real estate cases, but Vagnini said more than 75 percent of its work is civil rights or discrimination cases.
“We have a passion for this,” Kane said.
“The team of attorneys at Valli Kane & Vagnini are the Morris Dees and Thurgood Marshall of our era and it is important that we work together as a team and fight until Justice runs down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Rev. Ronald Wright – Executive Director, Justice Seekers Texas
The lawsuit was filed Wednesday by 11 African-Americans, one Hispanic and one Asian-American employee.
“It’s business as usual. It’s a good old boy syndrome,” said employee Leroy White.
Among other things, the lawsuit cites a noose displayed in an employee’s car at the Southside Water Treatment Plant two years ago.
”Five days later he came with a bigger noose,” said employee Clement Bernard. “He stated it was because he thought I was wrong for making him take the noose out of his truck on city property.”
The city disciplined the employee with the noose and that employee later resigned.
“The City took corrective measures regarding these situations at the time the allegations were first reported. The City denies that it has engaged in any unlawful conduct,” he said.
The statement said a specific program was developed for the water department to avoid discrimination and a hostile work environment.
But the lawsuit claims discrimination still exists.
“These individuals have raised these complaints with the city of Dallas and with their employers for years,” attorney Jay Ellwanger said. “We’re asking that it stop. We’re asking that our clients be given damages.”
DALLAS – From racial slurs to a hangman’s noose, 13 Dallas employees say they’ve had enough. The group has filed a federal lawsuit, which they say outlines a culture of outright racism.
The plaintiffs filed their suit Wednesday. They include black, Hispanic and Asian workers of Dallas Water Utilities.
The employees claim they were threatened, verbally harassed and intimidated by racist graffiti written on bathroom walls. There was also an incident involving a hangman’s noose dangling from a city vehicle, according to the lawsuit.
A statement from the city of Dallas said officials deny the unlawful conduct.
The city said some of the allegations date back seven years and corrective measures were taken then. The statement also said the Department of Justice declined to file a lawsuit in the case.
Watch FOX 4 Matt Grubs’ video story to hear from both the employees and a city spokesman.
Published 17 December 2009 11:56 AM
The suit paints a picture of the city’s water department as a racially divided institution where discrimination is a normal practice.
Lead plaintiff Leroy White, a black electrician, said he has been subjected to racial slurs and drawings denigrating blacks as he was passed over for promotions for less qualified white employees.
White and the other plaintiffs said they have long been subjected to more work and higher scrutiny than white employees.
“It’s common practice. It’s just the way things are done in the water department,” White said.
In a statement, a city spokesman responded that City Hall has not acted unlawfully or tolerated discrimination.
“The city has not had an opportunity to review all of the allegations. However, many of the allegations concern specific incidents that are several years old, about which the city took corrective measures regarding these situations at the time the allegations were first reported,” the statement said.
The allegations portray a department where workers are segregated by race and where some white employees resort to threats, bribery and deceit to discredit complaints and keep the plaintiffs from being promoted.
Jay Ellwanger, attorney for the plaintiffs, said he and his clients met with Mayor Tom Leppert and City Manager Mary Suhm earlier this year.
Despite that meeting, nothing was done about his clients’ complaints, he said.
The plaintiffs include 11 blacks, one Hispanic and one Asian.
They are seeking unspecified monetary damages and a correction to the alleged discrimination in Water Utilities, Ellwanger said.
In addition to White, the plaintiffs include Terrence Marshall, Arturo Garza, Clement Bernard, Faye Jackson, James Yellowfish, Jewell Taylor, Kevin Gillum, Kevin McArthur, Marcus Greer, Micheal Roberts, Roderick Tolor and Thai Nguyen.
A group of Dallas civil rights advocates, led by the Revs. Peter Johnson and Ronald Wright, is asking a U.S. federal court to bar Dallas City Hall from beginning construction of a Dallas Convention Center hotel.
The group, which filed a lawsuit today in U.S. federal court, wants hotel construction delayed until Dallas conducts a scheduled May 9 referendum on a City Charter amendment proposition seeking to prohibit Dallas from owning a convention center hotel, as it plans to do.
The lawsuit lists the City of Dallas, Dallas Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation and Mayor Tom Leppert as defendants and accuses them of failing to “submit for preclearance from the United States Attorney General or the United States District Court for the District of Columbia their plan to ignore the pending Charter Amendment election called for by Plaintiffs and other minority citizens of Dallas, and to commence the sale of potentially encumbering bonds and construction of the Dallas Convention Center Hotel.”
Says James Vagnini, a lawyer for Wright and Johnson: “This is a slap in the face to voters what the mayor is trying to do. This issue should go to a vote in May without questions about the outcome mattering.”
(CLICK HERE to read a copy of the federal complaint.)
Leppert blasted the lawsuit, calling it “ridiculous.”
“The Dallas City Council just voted to put the proposition on the ballot for the May 9th city elections,” the mayor wrote in a statement. “Additionally, the election has already been submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice for preclearance as is required by law. We are going forward with the vote.”
Dallas’ First Assistant City Attorney Chris Bowers vowed to aggressively fight the suit, saying the city will likely file a motion to dismiss it.
“We strongly deny that the city is or will be violating the Voting Rights Act,” Bowers said.
Leppert and many other city officials have said they want construction to begin as quickly as possible — a stance that’s drawn sharp criticism from hotel opponents.
But a turbulent bond market may prevent the city from seeking financing for the more than $500 million project. Dallas is seeking a 5.5 percent interest rate on revenue bonds that would be used to construct the hotel — a rate it is unable to procure today.
Dave Cook, Dallas’ chief financial officer, said earlier this week that Dallas wouldn’t be prepared to sell bonds for at least several more weeks, and possibly several more months. “A lot depends on the market,” he said.
Today’s legal action is the third time in a month that hotel opponents have taken action against the city in federal court.
In February, the Citizens Against the Taxpayer-Owned Hotel organization sought in federal court to block the Dallas City Council from approving hotel developing and operating agreements.
The court rejected one complaint and Citizens Against the Taxpayer-Owned Hotel voluntarily withdrew another, and ultimately, the Dallas City Council approved the hotel’s development and operating agreements.
Original Article: https://cityhallblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/03/civil-rights-advocates-seek-in.html